Properties (2)

Body

gaps in ecological validity, temporal response trajectory, and individual differences in trigger reactivity and recovery

Shan 2026 describes three major gaps in the literature.

narrative version of notes

Shan 2026 describes three major gaps in the literature. First, existing research relies predominantly on retrospective self-reports and laboratory paradigms, which lack ecological validity and fail to capture how emotional responses unfold in naturalistic settings where triggers occur unpredictably. Second, prior work has rarely examined how emotional responses to triggers evolve over time, focusing instead on presence or absence of intense reactions rather than their temporal trajectory, duration, and recovery patterns. Third, individual differences in emotional reactivity and recovery remain largely unexplored, as most studies report group-level effects that may obscure meaningful person-specific variation in how individuals respond to and recover from trigger events, including the roles of misophonia severity, co-occurring psychiatric conditions, and baseline emotional states. (Shan et al., 2026)