Properties (10)
Year 2025
Abstract
Cssclasses
  • purpleRed
Aliases
  • The relationship between cognitive disengagement syndrome and misophonia in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  • (Gercek et al., 2025)
Key Terms
  • Misophonia
  • ADHD
  • CDS
  • SCT-SR
  • A-MISO-S-R
  • T-DSM-IV-S
Import Date 08-24-2025
Dv Limitations • Small sample size limits generalizability. • Cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. • Reliance on parent-report for ADHD symptoms; no adolescent self-report data. • used the Amsterdam scale ( that i am not a fan of)
Dv Relevance • looked at the correlation between Misophonia and several comorbidities of interest including ADHD, and cognitive disengagement syndrome. • a good source on the Misophonia-attention link from a clinical perspective as well as as a good source for a ( at the time of my reading ) new to me concept of cognitive disengagement syndrome.
Dv Future Directions • Larger longitudinal studies to explore causal pathways and effects of ADHD medication on misophonia. • Examine CDS as a transdiagnostic vulnerability factor in neurodevelopmental and internalizing conditions. • Investigate treatment targets addressing both misophonia and CDS in ADHD populations.
Checked For Zettle Notes true

•

The relationship between cognitive disengagement syndrome and misophonia in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: the mediating role of cognitive disengagement syndrome symptoms

Status:: #status/complete


Metadata


Abstract

Background/Purpose Background-
• Misophonia is increasingly recognized as distinct from general sound sensitivity disorders like hyperacusis.
• Often comorbid with internalizing disorders (anxiety, depression), with less research on externalizing comorbidities.
• Links between ADHD and sensory sensitivity have been noted, but associations with misophonia are unclear.
• CDS is conceptually and phenomenologically related to inattention and internalizing symptoms, but has not been studied in relation to misophonia.

Purpose-

• Investigate the prevalence and severity of misophonia symptoms in adolescents with ADHD vs. controls.
• Examine the relationship between misophonia, ADHD symptom dimensions (inattention vs. hyperactivity), and CDS.
• Test whether CDS symptoms mediate the relationship between ADHD-inattention and misophonia.
Participants/samples • N = 103 adolescents (53 with ADHD, 50 healthy controls).
• Ages 12–18, recruited from two outpatient clinics in Türkiye.
• ADHD group: diagnosed per DSM-5 via K-SADS-PL interviews.
• Exclusion: comorbid psychiatric diagnoses (depression, anxiety), chronic medical conditions.
Measures • ADHD symptoms: Turgay DSM-IV-Based Disruptive Behavior Disorders Scale (T-DSM-IV-S), parent-reported.
• Misophonia: Amsterdam Misophonia Scale-Revised (AMISOS-R), adolescent self-report.
• CDS symptoms: Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Self-Report Scale (SCT-SR), adolescent self-report.
Procedures • Participants completed AMISOS-R and SCT-SR.
• Parents of participants completed the T-DSM-IV-S.
• K-SADS-PL interviews used to confirm diagnoses.
• Statistical analyses included correlation, regression, and mediation analysis via bootstrapping.
Results • ADHD group had significantly higher misophonia (AMISOS-R) scores than controls.
• Misophonia severity positively correlated with:
• T-DSM-IV-S inattention (r = 0.513),
• T-DSM-IV-S hyperactivity/impulsivity (r = 0.291),
• SCT-SR (r = 0.661).
• Regression analysis: inattention (β = 0.833, p < 0.001) was the only independent predictor of misophonia severity.
• Mediation analysis confirmed that CDS symptoms partially mediated the inattention–misophonia relationship (indirect effect: b = 0.37, 95% CI [0.22, 0.54], p < 0.018).
Discussion/Limits Conclusion-
• ADHD and CDS symptoms are associated with increased misophonia severity.
• Inattention is the strongest ADHD-related predictor of misophonia.
• CDS symptoms act as a partial mediator, suggesting shared neurocognitive or affective vulnerabilities.
• Misophonia may be best conceptualized as a transdiagnostic issue linked to attentional and internalizing symptomatology.
Limitations:: • Small sample size limits generalizability.
• Cross-sectional design precludes causal inference.
• Reliance on parent-report for ADHD symptoms; no adolescent self-report data.
• used the Amsterdam scale ( that i am not a fan of)
Future Directions:: • Larger longitudinal studies to explore causal pathways and effects of ADHD medication on misophonia.
• Examine CDS as a transdiagnostic vulnerability factor in neurodevelopmental and internalizing conditions.
• Investigate treatment targets addressing both misophonia and CDS in ADHD populations.
Relevance:: • looked at the correlation between Misophonia and several comorbidities of interest including ADHD, and cognitive disengagement syndrome.
• a good source on the Misophonia-attention link from a clinical perspective as well as as a good source for a ( at the time of my reading ) new to me concept of cognitive disengagement syndrome.

Notes

key terms and concepts

my engagement notes

my questions

my comments

Bookmarks

reading notes

Trigger Types and Emotions

Clinical Implications

zettelkasten