Properties (12)
- purpleRed
- (Mednicoff et al., 2024)
•
Misophonia reactions in the general population are correlated with strong emotional reactions to other everyday sensory–emotional experiences
Status:: #status/Bare-bones-review
Metadata
- Item Type: #journalArticle
- Authors: Solena D. Mednicoff, Sivan Barashy, David J. Vollweiler, Stephen D. Benning, Joel S. Snyder, Erin E. Hannon,
- Date Added: January 4, 2025
- URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2023.0253
- DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0253
- Cite Key: mednicoffMisophoniaReactionsGeneral2024
- Tags: #Misophonia, #Bare-bones-review-🦴
- PDF Attachments
Article review table
| Background/Purpose | Background- - Misophonia is increasingly recognized as a distinct disorder, separate from hyperacusis and phonophobia, with roots in affective rather than sensory processing. - It is common in the general population and overlaps with traits such as neuroticism, anxiety, and emotional dysregulation. - Positive emotional experiences like ASMR and musical chills share some auditory triggers with misophonia. - Neural correlates of misophonia, ASMR, and musical chills suggest shared involvement of insula, auditory cortex, and other emotion-related areas. - Existing studies have not fully explored whether a general trait of emotional reactivity underlies these phenomena or the role of musicality. Purpose- - Examine correlations between misophonia reactions and reactions to ASMR and musical chills. - Assess whether musical sophistication/emotional engagement with music predicts misophonic responses. - Use real-time video-based emotional response tracking to assess correlations across sensory-emotional reactions in a general population sample. • Examine whether individuals with stronger misophonic reactions also show stronger emotional reactions to ASMR and musical chills. • Test whether musicality predicts emotional reactions to misophonia, ASMR, and chills. • Investigate misophonia in a non-clinical general population sample. • Evaluate real-time emotional reactions to videos across emotional categories. |
| Participants/samples | - Total participants (final sample): 278 - Age: M = 30.7 years (range: 18–76) - Gender: 59.7% female, 33.5% male, 6.8% gender-diverse categories - Recruitment: Mixed online (Reddit, social media, UNLV pool), incentivized for students only - Inclusion criteria: English proficiency, normal/corrected vision and hearing, absence of confounding health conditions - Exclusion: Failed attention checks, audio loading failures, noncompliance |
| Measures | - A-MISO-S (Amsterdam Misophonia Scale) – Assesses severity across 6 dimensions. - Self-reports: ASMR experience, musical chills experience - Gold-MSI: Musical training, emotional engagement, overall musical sophistication - Behavioral: Button presses during video viewing indicating emotional reaction - Self-assessment Manikin (SAM): Valence and arousal ratings for each video |
| Procedures | Stimuli - 37 videos (15s–60s) across 5 conditions: - Misophonia triggers (10) - ASMR triggers (10) - Musical chills (5) - Neutral (10) - Annoying (2) Task - Participants clicked a button for any emotional response (positive/negative) - Provided valence (pleasantness) and arousal ratings post-video - Video categories randomized; headphone checks and attention checks implemented • Online study via Qualtrics. • Headphone check (phase inversion tone test). • Three blocks (random order): • Misophonia block (10 × 15s videos) • ASMR block (10 × 15s videos) • Musical chills block (5 × 60s music videos) • Additional: • 10 neutral videos (15s) • 2 universally annoying videos • Participants clicked button during emotional reaction. • After each video: • Valence rating • Arousal rating • Bayesian correlations and regressions conducted in JASP. |
| Results | - Correlations: - Misophonia reactions were significantly correlated with both ASMR (r = .53) and chills (r = .45) reactions. - Self-reported misophonia severity (A-MISO-S) was positively correlated with misophonia reaction rate, arousal, and negatively with valence. - Misophonia reactions correlated with arousal but not with valence or arousal for ASMR and chills videos. - Regressions: - Best predictors for misophonia reactions: misophonia valence, ASMR reactions, chills reactions, A-MISO-S score. - ASMR and chills reactions best predicted by each other’s responses and arousal ratings. - Musical sophistication (Gold-MSI) scores were not predictive of misophonia, ASMR, or chills reactions. - Valence recoding: - Data recoded based on subjective valence ratings to better isolate negative (misophonia) and positive (ASMR) reactions. - Reanalysis confirmed strong relationships between A-MISO-S scores and negative-valence video responses. |
| Discussion/Limits | Conclusion- - Misophonia, ASMR, and musical chills are intercorrelated, suggesting a general emotional reactivity phenotype or enhanced interoceptive processing. - Real-time misophonia responses correlate with A-MISO-S severity scores, validating the video-task as a useful potential clinical tool. - Musical training or emotional musical engagement does not predict misophonia or associated emotional reactivity. • Emotional reactions to misophonia, ASMR, and musical chills videos were correlated. • Pattern persisted after valence recoding. • Misophonia severity correlated with real-time reactions, valence, and arousal. • Musical sophistication, musical training, and emotional engagement not correlated with misophonia. • Authors propose correlations may reflect: • General emotional reactivity characteristic. • Enhanced interoceptive processing. • Real-time video reaction measures may have clinical utility. |
| Limitations:: | • Online format limits control over environment, audio delivery, and timing precision. • Lack of fine-grained emotion reporting during video responses. • No direct physiological or interoceptive measures used. • Did not control for or assess comorbid conditions systematically. |
| Future Directions:: | Explore neural/physiological markers (e.g., heartbeat-evoked potentials) related to interoception and emotional reactivity. • Assess temporal alignment of emotional responses across participants. • Use objective musical ability tests to re-evaluate associations with misophonia. • Investigate misophonia reactions with larger, more diverse stimulus sets and in clinical population |
| Relevance:: | • good source for basic review of the emphasis of top down cog processing in Misophonia • Validates Misophonia in Non-Clinical Populations. Highlights that misophonic responses are common across the general population, extending the phenomenon beyond clinical samples. • Confirms Misophonia as Emotionally, Not Just Sensory, Driven. Findings emphasize affective reactivity over peripheral auditory dysfunction, supporting theories that misophonia involves high-level emotional and interoceptive processing. • Supports Real-Time, Ecologically Valid Assessment. Demonstrates that real-time emotional reaction tasks (e.g., video click tasks) are meaningfully correlated with self-report scales (A-MISO-S), offering a promising tool for future diagnostics. • Dissociates Misophonia from Musicality. No correlation found between misophonia and musical training or emotional musical engagement, contradicting some assumptions about their linkage and refining hypotheses about underlying mechanisms. • Shows Overlap Between Positive and Negative Auditory-Affective Phenomena. Strong correlations between misophonia, ASMR, and musical chills suggest a shared trait of heightened emotional reactivity to auditory stimuli, whether aversive or pleasurable. • Illustrates the Role of Interoceptive Processing. Suggests that internal body awareness and affective regulation (e.g., insular cortex activity) might be central to how people experience emotionally salient sounds. • Demonstrates Multimodal Emotional Integration. Emphasizes the significance of audio-visual integration and subjective meaning in shaping emotional reactions, relevant for broader models of auditory perception and affect. • Challenges Purely Bottom-Up Models of Auditory Emotion. Evidence supports top-down modulation (e.g., personal relevance, context, personality traits) in determining emotional responses to sounds, refining computational and neural models of sound processing. • Points to a Continuum of Emotional Reactivity. Positions misophonia, ASMR, and chills along a common spectrum of affective responsivity, with potential implications for emotional processing models and psychiatric comorbidities. • Encourages Use of Bayesian Analysis in Affective Auditory Research. Provides a robust framework for evaluating null and alternative hypotheses in correlational cognitive studies, avoiding binary p-value interpretations. |
Notes
key terms and concepts
-
Misophonia – A decreased tolerance to specific sounds that trigger strong negative emotional reactions (e.g., anger, disgust), typically without an underlying hearing impairment.
-
ASMR (Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response) – A tingling sensation triggered by specific audio-visual stimuli, typically experienced as relaxing and pleasant.
-
Musical chills (Frisson) – A physical and emotional response to emotionally intense moments in music, often described as tingles or goosebumps.
-
A-MISO-S – The Amsterdam Misophonia Scale, a 6-item scale used to assess the severity of misophonia symptoms.
-
Gold-MSI – Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index, a questionnaire assessing musical engagement and aptitude.
-
Valence – The hedonic tone of an emotional response (pleasantness/unpleasantness).
-
Arousal – The degree of emotional intensity or stimulation experienced in response to a stimulus.